A Study of the Effectiveness of an HIV Vaccine (ALVAC vCP205) to Boost Immune Functions in HIV-Negative Volunteers Who Have Already Received an HIV Vaccine

NCT ID: NCT00001136

Last Updated: 2021-11-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Completion Date

2001-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to see if it is safe to give an HIV vaccine (vCP205) to volunteers who received an HIV vaccine at least 2 years ago, and to study how the immune system responds to this vaccine.

Vaccines are given to people to try to resist infection or prevent disease. There are a number of different HIV vaccines that are currently being tested. The vaccines that seem to be the most promising are canarypox vaccines, known as ALVAC vaccines; the vaccine tested in this study is ALVAC-HIV vCP205. This study will look at the safety of the vaccine and how the immune system responds to it.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Vaccines may provide a route of therapy against HIV-1 infections by boosting the immune system responses. An artificially constructed HIV-1 vaccine (NYCBH), using vaccinia virus as its vector, has the advantage of conferring both cellular and humoral immune responses that are long-lived. Studies have shown that a second artificially constructed vector vaccine, HIV-1 canarypox (vCP205), also increases CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity, a cell-mediated immune response. Yet, immune responses are not boosted in volunteers previously vaccinated with vaccinia-based HIV-1 vaccines when a second vaccination with the same vaccine is given. One theory for vaccinia vaccine's failure is that immunologic barriers by antibodies to the vector itself may be responsible. This study examines the effectiveness of boosting the immune responses following vCP205 vaccination in the following: 1) volunteers who were previously immunized with vCP205 vaccine who may or may not have shown increased immune responses following the first immunization, and 2) volunteers who were previously immunized with NYCBH vaccine.

Upon study entry volunteers receive one injection of ALVAC-HIV vCP205. Temperature and symptoms should be recorded by the volunteer each day for 2 days and reported to the clinic staff. Volunteers will have seven clinic visits for drawing blood, collecting urine specimens, and performing clinical evaluations. At Month 3 HIV testing will be done. Volunteers will be followed for 3 months, with a passive follow-up call at the end of a year and once or twice a year for the next 5 years. Counseling on avoidance of HIV infection and pregnancy will be done.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections HIV Seronegativity

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Injections, Intramuscular HIV-1 AIDS Vaccines CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic Gene Products, gag HIV Seronegativity Immunologic Memory Antibodies, Viral Genetic Vectors Gene Products, env Poxviridae HIV Preventive Vaccine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ALVAC-HIV MN120TMG (vCP205)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

You may be eligible for this study if you:

* Are 18-60 years old.
* Are willing to use adequate birth control for 1 month before study entry and during the study.
* Have a CD4 count of at least 400 cells/mm3.
* Have a normal medical history and physical examination.
* Are available for 3 months of follow-up.
* Have participated in AVEG Protocol 014C or 022A and received all the scheduled vaccinations 24 or more months before this study, or have never participated in HIV-vaccine studies.
* Are HIV-negative within 8 weeks of study entry.
* Are negative for hepatitis B surface antigen.

Exclusion Criteria

You will not be eligible for this study if you:

* Are pregnant or breast-feeding.
* Have a history of an immune system problem, any long-term illness, or any autoimmune disease.
* Have a history of using medications which affect your immune system.
* Have a history of cancer, except if it has been removed with surgery and cure is most likely.
* Have a medical or mental condition which interferes with the study.
* Have a job or work which interferes with the study.
* Have ever attempted suicide, thought of attempting suicide, or have a severe mental condition.
* Have received vaccines within 60 days of study entry.
* Have used experimental drugs within 30 days prior to study entry.
* Have received any blood products, such as immunoglobulin, in the last 6 months.
* Have active syphilis.
* Have active tuberculosis.
* Have any history of severe allergic reactions, including reactions to vaccines.
* Have an allergy to egg products or neomycin.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Evans

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UAB AVEG

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

JHU AVEG

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

St. Louis Univ. School of Medicine AVEG

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Univ. of Rochester AVEG

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt Univ. Hosp. AVEG

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

UW - Seattle AVEG

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10586

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AVEG 038

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id