A Study on Amprenavir in Combination With Other Anti-HIV Drugs in HIV-Positive Patients

NCT ID: NCT00000912

Last Updated: 2021-10-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

475 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Completion Date

2000-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare 4 different combinations of anti-HIV drugs and to determine the number of people whose HIV blood levels decrease to 200 copies/ml or less while on the treatment. This study evaluates the safety of these drug combinations, which include an experimental protease inhibitor (PI), amprenavir.

Despite the success that many patients have had with PI treatment regimens, there is still a possibility that patients receiving PIs may continue to have high HIV blood levels. Because of this possibility, alternative drug combinations containing PIs are being studied. It appears that amprenavir, when taken with 3 or 4 other anti-HIV drugs, may be effective in patients with prior PI treatment experience.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A number of studies both within and outside the ACTG have been initiated or are in development to try to address the issue of alternative treatments for patients who either do not achieve or lose virologic control while receiving protease inhibitors (PIs). Amprenavir (APV) is an attractive candidate to investigate as part of salvage regimens because: 1) it has substantial antiretroviral activity; 2) there are preliminary in vitro and in vivo data that suggest that resistance to this agent may be mediated in part by a unique mutation (I50V); and 3) its cross-resistance profile to the approved PIs is uncertain.

Patients are selectively randomized to 1 of 4 study arms based on prior PI experience. Those randomized to Arms A, B, or C receive 2 PIs, 1 of which is amprenavir (APV), and those randomized to Arm D receive a single PI (APV) as part of their treatment regimen, as follows:

Arm A: APV plus saquinavir soft gel capsule (SQVsgc) plus abacavir (ABC) plus efavirenz (EFV) plus adefovir (ADV).

Arm B: APV plus indinavir (IDV) plus ABC plus EFV plus ADV. Arm C: APV plus nelfinavir (NFV) plus ABC plus EFV plus ADV. Arm D: APV plus placebo (NFV, IDV, or SQVsgc) plus ABC plus EFV plus ADV. All patients receive L-carnitine supplementation. All patients receive clinical physical assessments and laboratory testing during study as follows: Weeks 2, 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. A primary analysis is performed after the last patient has reached 24 weeks. \[AS PER AMENDMENT 3/2/00: At that time, all patients are unblinded to their original treatment assignment.\] Patients who experience virologic failure are unblinded and may choose 1 of the following 3 options: Continue study medications open-label, permanently discontinue study medications, or selectively continue study medications \[AS PER AMENDMENT 3/2/00: from the arm the patient was originally randomized to\] and combine with other approved antiretroviral agents. \[AS PER AMENDMENT 3/2/00: For patients adding didanosine (ddI) to their regimens, monitoring for the development of pancreatitis is crucial.\] Final evaluations are required for those patients who are off drug during the immediate 8-week period following the last dose of study treatment. Beyond 8 weeks, they are followed for incidence of death, cancer, congenital anomalies, and permanent disabilities. \[AS PER AMENDMENT 3/2/00: Gilead Sciences has terminated its U.S. development of ADV for HIV infection. Gilead will continue to supply ADV for patients in ACTG 398 until the study closes. Patients who are receiving ADV at the completion of the study may continue to access ADV through the Expanded Access Program, provided that the physician and patient have determined that continued use of ADV is beneficial.\]

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Placebos Drug Therapy, Combination HIV Protease Inhibitors VX 478 Anti-HIV Agents Viral Load efavirenz

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Indinavir sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Abacavir sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Amprenavir

Intervention Type DRUG

Nelfinavir mesylate

Intervention Type DRUG

Efavirenz

Intervention Type DRUG

Levocarnitine

Intervention Type DRUG

Adefovir dipivoxil

Intervention Type DRUG

Saquinavir

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients may be eligible for this study if they:

* Are HIV-positive.
* Have current virologic failure (2 consecutive HIV blood levels above 1,000 copies/ml) while on PIs.
* Are over 13 years of age (consent of parent or guardian required if under 18).
* Agree to practice abstinence or use effective methods of birth control during the study and for 90 days after.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients will not be eligible for this study if they:

* Have hepatitis within 90 days prior to study entry.
* Have a history of a peripheral neuropathy within 60 days of study entry.
* Have an unexplained temperature for a 7-day period.
* Have chronic diarrhea within 30 days prior to study entry.
* Have cancer requiring chemotherapy.
* Received any therapy for infection or other illness within 30 days prior to study entry.
* Have received certain other medications.
* Are pregnant or breast-feeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Scott Hammer

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

John Mellors

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Univ of Southern California / LA County USC Med Ctr

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

USC Univ Hosp & Ambulatory Hlth Care Ctr / USC Med Ctr

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UCLA CARE Ctr

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Willow Clinic

Menlo Park, California, United States

Site Status

Univ of California / San Diego Treatment Ctr

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco AIDS Clinic / San Francisco Gen Hosp

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco Gen Hosp

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Clara Valley Med Ctr / AIDS Community Rsch Consortium

San Jose, California, United States

Site Status

San Mateo AIDS Program / Stanford Univ

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford Univ Med Ctr

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Univ of Colorado Health Sciences Ctr

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Howard Univ

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Univ of Miami School of Medicine

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory Univ

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Emory Hemo Comp Evaluation Clinic / East TN Comp Hemo Ctr

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Queens Med Ctr

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Univ of Hawaii

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Tripler Army Med Ctr

Tripler AMC, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Univ Med School

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Cook County Hosp

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rush Presbyterian - Saint Luke's Med Ctr

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Charity Hosp / Tulane Univ Med School

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Tulane Univ School of Medicine

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins Hosp

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Harvard (Massachusetts Gen Hosp)

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Boston Med Ctr

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Univ of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis Regional Hosp / St Louis Regional Med Ctr

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

SUNY / Erie County Med Ctr at Buffalo

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Bellevue Hosp / New York Univ Med Ctr

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Chelsea Ctr

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Cornell Univ Med Ctr

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Mem Sloan - Kettering Cancer Ctr

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai Med Ctr

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Univ of Rochester Medical Center

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke Univ Med Ctr

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Moses H Cone Memorial Hosp

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Univ of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State Univ Hosp Clinic

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Milton S Hershey Med Ctr

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Univ of Pennsylvania at Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Univ of Pittsburgh Med Ctr

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Univ of Texas Galveston

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Univ of Washington

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Univ of Puerto Rico

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Puerto Rico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pfister M, Labbe L, Hammer SM, Mellors J, Bennett KK, Rosenkranz S, Sheiner LB; Adult AIDS Clinical Trial Group Study 398. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of efavirenz, nelfinavir, and indinavir: Adult AIDS Clinical Trial Group Study 398. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Jan;47(1):130-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.1.130-137.2003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12499180 (View on PubMed)

Pfister M, Labbe L, Lu JF, Hammer SM, Mellors J, Bennett KK, Rosenkranz S, Sheiner LB; AIDS Clinical Trial Group Protocol 398 Investigators. Effect of coadministration of nelfinavir, indinavir, and saquinavir on the pharmacokinetics of amprenavir. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Aug;72(2):133-41. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.126183.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12189360 (View on PubMed)

Hammer SM, Vaida F, Bennett KK, Holohan MK, Sheiner L, Eron JJ, Wheat LJ, Mitsuyasu RT, Gulick RM, Valentine FT, Aberg JA, Rogers MD, Karol CN, Saah AJ, Lewis RH, Bessen LJ, Brosgart C, DeGruttola V, Mellors JW; AIDS Clinical Trials Group 398 Study Team. Dual vs single protease inhibitor therapy following antiretroviral treatment failure: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2002 Jul 10;288(2):169-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.2.169.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12095381 (View on PubMed)

Sun J, Nagaraj HN, Reynolds NR. Discrete stochastic models for compliance analysis based on an AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) study. Biom J. 2007 Aug;49(5):731-41. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200610368.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17726714 (View on PubMed)

Ghosh P, Ghosh K, Tiwari RC. Joint modeling of longitudinal data and informative dropout time in the presence of multiple changepoints. Stat Med. 2011 Mar 15;30(6):611-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.4119. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21337357 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11354

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Substudy ACTG 5003s

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ACTG 398

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id