The Addition of Indinavir to Anti-HIV Treatment in HIV-Infected Patients

NCT ID: NCT00000861

Last Updated: 2021-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1900 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Completion Date

1997-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of immediate versus deferred indinavir (IDV) in addition to background therapy on disease progression or death in patients with CD4+ cell counts between 200 and 500 cells/mm3 and plasma HIV RNA levels \>= 10,000 copies/ml.

This study aims to examine two management strategies, immediate versus deferred IDV therapy, for their clinical effects in the context of background antiretroviral (AR) therapy, given according to current clinical practice. There is an urgent need to identify the optimal use of IDV in patient management, since clinical endpoint studies have not been completed in the United States. Since there is little information about the long term durability of clinical effects, and even less information about the timing of the initiation of protease inhibitor therapy, exploring the disease progression and survival impact of immediate versus delayed use of IDV will yield important information to guide clinical decision making for this group of patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aims to examine two management strategies, immediate versus deferred IDV therapy, for their clinical effects in the context of background antiretroviral (AR) therapy, given according to current clinical practice. There is an urgent need to identify the optimal use of IDV in patient management, since clinical endpoint studies have not been completed in the United States. Since there is little information about the long term durability of clinical effects, and even less information about the timing of the initiation of protease inhibitor therapy, exploring the disease progression and survival impact of immediate versus delayed use of IDV will yield important information to guide clinical decision making for this group of patients.

Prior to randomization the patient and clinician will determine whether the background therapy will be zidovudine (ZDV) plus lamivudine (3TC) or other background antiretroviral therapy (OBAT). Patients will then be randomized to IDV or matching placebo. AS PER AMENDMENT 06/27/97: The protocol was closed as of 03/25/97, and all patients have been unblinded to their assigned treatment. Patients still on study medication are eligible for the protocol extension. Patients who were randomized to immediate IDV may continue on therapy for up to an additional 4 months. All study therapy, both for those on immediate or delayed therapy, must be discontinued on 10/24/97.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Drug Administration Schedule HIV Protease Inhibitors CD4 Lymphocyte Count Indinavir RNA, Viral Anti-HIV Agents Viral Load

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Indinavir sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Concurrent Medication:

Allowed:

* Topical and/or antifungal agents, except ketoconazole.
* Treatment, maintenance, or chemoprophylaxis with approved agents for OIs will be given as clinically indicated.
* Clinically indicated antibiotics, unless excluded.
* Systemic corticosteroid use for \<21 days for acute problems is permitted as clinically indicated. However, chronic systemic corticosteroid use should be avoided.
* Recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim).
* Didanosine (ddI).
* Regularly prescribed medications, such as antipyretics, antidepressants, oral contraceptives, megestrol acetate, testosterone, or any other medication.

Patients must have:

* A working diagnosis of HIV infection.
* A CD4+ count between 200 and 500 cells/mm3.
* Signed, informed parental consent if patient is less than 18.

NOTE:

* The DAIDS Clinical Science Research Committee (CSRC) has deemed this protocol appropriate for prisoner enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

Co-existing Condition:

Patients with any of the following conditions or symptoms are excluded:

Febrile illness with temperature \> 38.5 degrees C (101.3 degrees F) within 3 days prior to study entry.

Concurrent Medication:

Excluded:

* Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
* Protease inhibitors except IDV.
* Rifabutin and rifampin.
* Ketoconazole.
* Terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, triazolam and midazolam.

Patients with any of the following prior conditions are excluded:

* History of prior saquinavir (SQV) therapy for more than 14 days.
* History of any prior protease inhibitor therapy other than SQV.
* History of serious opportunistic infection.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Saravolatz L

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Crane L

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Mayers D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Community Consortium of San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Denver CPCRA / Denver Public Hlth

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Veterans Administration Med Ctr / Regional AIDS Program

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

AIDS Research Alliance - Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Louisiana Comm AIDS Rsch Prog / Tulane Univ Med

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive AIDS Alliance of Detroit

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hosp

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Southern New Jersey AIDS Cln Trials / Dept of Med

Camden, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

North Jersey Community Research Initiative

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Harlem AIDS Treatment Group / Harlem Hosp Ctr

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Portland Veterans Adm Med Ctr / Rsch & Education Grp

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia FIGHT

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Richmond AIDS Consortium

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Spector SA, Barker C, Buhles W, Feinberg J, Montague P, Weingeist T, DeArmond B. A randomized, controlled study of immediate vs deferred ganciclovir therapy in AIDS patients with cytomegalovirus peripheral retinitis. Int Conf AIDS. 1991 Jun 16-21;7(1):44 (abstract no MB86)

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11591

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CPCRA 041

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id